<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 173 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393029</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties imposed on the appellant for concealed income and an unsecured loan. The penalties were deleted due to insufficient evidence and lack of proper consideration of explanations provided by the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of proper direction and thorough consideration of explanations in penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 173 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393029</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties imposed on the appellant for concealed income and an unsecured loan. The penalties were deleted due to insufficient evidence and lack of proper consideration of explanations provided by the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of proper direction and thorough consideration of explanations in penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>