<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 172 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393028</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting additions for excess stock and unverifiable purchases. It criticized lower authorities for not considering the Registered Valuer&#039;s report and relying on the Departmental valuer&#039;s inflated valuation. The judgment stressed proper valuation methods and the AO&#039;s duty to verify facts. The order was pronounced on 18/02/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:15:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 172 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393028</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting additions for excess stock and unverifiable purchases. It criticized lower authorities for not considering the Registered Valuer&#039;s report and relying on the Departmental valuer&#039;s inflated valuation. The judgment stressed proper valuation methods and the AO&#039;s duty to verify facts. The order was pronounced on 18/02/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>