<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 171 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393027</link>
    <description>The penalties under Sections 271A and 271B were deleted as the turnover from speculative transactions was below the threshold requiring maintenance of books and audit. However, the penalty under Section 271(1)(b) was confirmed due to the assessee&#039;s failure to comply with the notice under Section 142(1) without any reasonable cause. The appeals for penalties under Sections 271A and 271B were allowed, while the appeal for the penalty under Section 271(1)(b) was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 171 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393027</link>
      <description>The penalties under Sections 271A and 271B were deleted as the turnover from speculative transactions was below the threshold requiring maintenance of books and audit. However, the penalty under Section 271(1)(b) was confirmed due to the assessee&#039;s failure to comply with the notice under Section 142(1) without any reasonable cause. The appeals for penalties under Sections 271A and 271B were allowed, while the appeal for the penalty under Section 271(1)(b) was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>