<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 169 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393025</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) should be taxed on only half of the properties acquired, with the remaining half taxed in the individual capacity of Shodhan Jr. The appeal was allowed on these terms, and the alternative grounds were dismissed as infructuous and academic. The judgment was delivered on September 24, 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 169 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393025</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) should be taxed on only half of the properties acquired, with the remaining half taxed in the individual capacity of Shodhan Jr. The appeal was allowed on these terms, and the alternative grounds were dismissed as infructuous and academic. The judgment was delivered on September 24, 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>