https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21589 Inherent jurisdiction to quash a pending prosecution should not be exercised where the challenge turns on mixed questions of fact and law requiring evidence and documentary materials not yet on record. The complaint's competence for the alleged Penal Code offences and the effect of the later setting aside of penalty were matters to be raised on a proper factual foundation, not at the threshold. The High Court therefore declined to terminate the prosecution at this stage and left the petitioner free to raise the objections before the trial magistrate in due course. en-us Mon, 20 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:07:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21589 Inherent jurisdiction to quash a pending prosecution should not be exercised where the challenge turns on mixed questions of fact and law requiring evidence and documentary materials not yet on record. The complaint's competence for the alleged Penal Code offences and the effect of the later setting aside of penalty were matters to be raised on a proper factual foundation, not at the threshold. The High Court therefore declined to terminate the prosecution at this stage and left the petitioner free to raise the objections before the trial magistrate in due course. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 20 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21589