<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 58 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21587</link>
    <description>The court determined that the circular allowed extra shift allowance for technical documentation constituting plant without the need to establish individual machinery&#039;s working shifts. The court emphasized adherence to the circular&#039;s terms and rejected arguments against its application, ruling in favor of the assessee. The court disregarded other judgments and answered the reference question affirmatively, stating that the drawings and designs were entitled to extra shift allowance as per the circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 58 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21587</link>
      <description>The court determined that the circular allowed extra shift allowance for technical documentation constituting plant without the need to establish individual machinery&#039;s working shifts. The court emphasized adherence to the circular&#039;s terms and rejected arguments against its application, ruling in favor of the assessee. The court disregarded other judgments and answered the reference question affirmatively, stating that the drawings and designs were entitled to extra shift allowance as per the circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>