https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392995 The court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 18 of the NDPS Act despite discrepancies in the presence of the Gazetted Officer during the search, non-production of the entire contraband in court, alleged violation of Section 50 of the NDPS Act, and lack of independent witnesses. The court found the recovery of contraband from the appellant's bag pivotal in affirming the conviction and dismissed the appeal. Additionally, the court permitted the appellant to seek relief for potential transfer to a jail in Madhya Pradesh for family access. en-us Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Mar 2020 11:31:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392995 The court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 18 of the NDPS Act despite discrepancies in the presence of the Gazetted Officer during the search, non-production of the entire contraband in court, alleged violation of Section 50 of the NDPS Act, and lack of independent witnesses. The court found the recovery of contraband from the appellant's bag pivotal in affirming the conviction and dismissed the appeal. Additionally, the court permitted the appellant to seek relief for potential transfer to a jail in Madhya Pradesh for family access. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392995