<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1332 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286572</link>
    <description>The Gujarat HC dismissed the appeal by the Revenue. Regarding disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-Tax Act, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, citing the GE India Technology Centre case that tax deduction is unnecessary if payments to non-residents are not taxable. Concerning disallowance under section 14A, the Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s application of the ruling in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Corrtech Energy, stating that since the assessee did not seek exemption for any income from tax, disallowance under section 14A was not warranted. Both issues favored the assessee based on existing legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 11:24:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1332 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286572</link>
      <description>The Gujarat HC dismissed the appeal by the Revenue. Regarding disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-Tax Act, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, citing the GE India Technology Centre case that tax deduction is unnecessary if payments to non-residents are not taxable. Concerning disallowance under section 14A, the Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s application of the ruling in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Corrtech Energy, stating that since the assessee did not seek exemption for any income from tax, disallowance under section 14A was not warranted. Both issues favored the assessee based on existing legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>