<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1299 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286557</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the levy of penalty under Section 221 but reduced the amount from Rs. 77,95,155/- to Rs. 20,55,573/-, finding the original penalty rate excessive. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed. The judgment emphasizes the unconditional responsibility to remit TDS on time and clarifies that financial difficulties do not constitute a valid reason for delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1299 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286557</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the levy of penalty under Section 221 but reduced the amount from Rs. 77,95,155/- to Rs. 20,55,573/-, finding the original penalty rate excessive. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed. The judgment emphasizes the unconditional responsibility to remit TDS on time and clarifies that financial difficulties do not constitute a valid reason for delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>