https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286550 Exclusive possession of hotel rooms for consideration, together with the grantor's lack of retained control and suppression of the best evidence, supported a finding that the occupiers were tenants and that the arrangements amounted to sub-letting under rent control law; those sub-lettings therefore furnished a ground of eviction. The lease's express prohibition on transfer without written consent defeated any claim of implied consent, and no waiver was proved because there was no clear, informed relinquishment of the landlord's right. Unauthorised construction of a new room in breach of a known head-lease condition, followed by its letting out, also attracted the statutory eviction ground. The tenant was liable to eviction. en-us Thu, 07 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Mar 2020 15:27:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286550 Exclusive possession of hotel rooms for consideration, together with the grantor's lack of retained control and suppression of the best evidence, supported a finding that the occupiers were tenants and that the arrangements amounted to sub-letting under rent control law; those sub-lettings therefore furnished a ground of eviction. The lease's express prohibition on transfer without written consent defeated any claim of implied consent, and no waiver was proved because there was no clear, informed relinquishment of the landlord's right. Unauthorised construction of a new room in breach of a known head-lease condition, followed by its letting out, also attracted the statutory eviction ground. The tenant was liable to eviction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286550