<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 134 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392990</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ application, making the rule absolute to the extent mentioned, leaving it to the applicant to establish the discharge of the show cause notice issued under GSTMOV-10. The judgment emphasized the importance of carefully assessing contraventions and intent to evade tax before resorting to confiscation actions, ensuring a fair and lawful process in matters related to detention, seizure, and confiscation of goods and conveyances under the GST laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 134 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392990</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ application, making the rule absolute to the extent mentioned, leaving it to the applicant to establish the discharge of the show cause notice issued under GSTMOV-10. The judgment emphasized the importance of carefully assessing contraventions and intent to evade tax before resorting to confiscation actions, ensuring a fair and lawful process in matters related to detention, seizure, and confiscation of goods and conveyances under the GST laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>