<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 129 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392985</link>
    <description>The High Court of Gujarat dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a tax case involving unexplained income additions based on cash transactions for land purchases. The court upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and the Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the Revenue failed to provide sufficient independent evidence to support the additions. The court emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence and the reliance on statements made before the Settlement Commission by third parties, stating that such statements alone were insufficient to establish transactions. The court concluded that the Revenue&#039;s case lacked substantial evidence, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 13:32:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 129 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392985</link>
      <description>The High Court of Gujarat dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a tax case involving unexplained income additions based on cash transactions for land purchases. The court upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and the Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the Revenue failed to provide sufficient independent evidence to support the additions. The court emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence and the reliance on statements made before the Settlement Commission by third parties, stating that such statements alone were insufficient to establish transactions. The court concluded that the Revenue&#039;s case lacked substantial evidence, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>