<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 658 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286549</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of forfeiting the Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) of Rs. 6,50,000/- each from Bhaskar Exxols Ltd. and Sankh Impex due to their breach of the auction terms. The court found that the bidders could not unilaterally withdraw their bids and upheld the validity and enforceability of the auction terms, including the forfeiture clause. The bidders were ordered to pay costs to the Official Liquidator, and the case proceedings were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 13:18:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 658 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286549</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of forfeiting the Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) of Rs. 6,50,000/- each from Bhaskar Exxols Ltd. and Sankh Impex due to their breach of the auction terms. The court found that the bidders could not unilaterally withdraw their bids and upheld the validity and enforceability of the auction terms, including the forfeiture clause. The bidders were ordered to pay costs to the Official Liquidator, and the case proceedings were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>