<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 119 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392975</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of undisclosed interest receipts, emphasizing the lack of evidence linking the assessee to the alleged payments. The Tribunal ruled that no liability could be imposed without evidence of interest payment, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to the absence of legal proof for the A.O.&#039;s presumption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 119 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392975</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of undisclosed interest receipts, emphasizing the lack of evidence linking the assessee to the alleged payments. The Tribunal ruled that no liability could be imposed without evidence of interest payment, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to the absence of legal proof for the A.O.&#039;s presumption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>