<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 92 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392948</link>
    <description>The Tribunal approved the Resolution Plan under Section 30(6) of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016, making it binding on the Corporate Debtor and stakeholders. The Resolution Applicant, M/s. Euro Pratik Ispat (India) Private Limited, emerged as the highest bidder with a financial bid of Rs. 3.01 Crore, which was accepted by the Committee of Creditors. The Plan included financial and operational restructuring, payment structures for creditors, and various reliefs sought by the Resolution Applicant. Compliance with statutory obligations was mandated within one year, with non-compliance leading to forfeiture of the Earnest Money Deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 11:24:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 92 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392948</link>
      <description>The Tribunal approved the Resolution Plan under Section 30(6) of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016, making it binding on the Corporate Debtor and stakeholders. The Resolution Applicant, M/s. Euro Pratik Ispat (India) Private Limited, emerged as the highest bidder with a financial bid of Rs. 3.01 Crore, which was accepted by the Committee of Creditors. The Plan included financial and operational restructuring, payment structures for creditors, and various reliefs sought by the Resolution Applicant. Compliance with statutory obligations was mandated within one year, with non-compliance leading to forfeiture of the Earnest Money Deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>