<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 87 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392943</link>
    <description>Where a liquidation sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern had not resulted in a concluded purchaser after the successful bidder withdrew, an enhanced offer could be accepted to maximise asset value and further the object of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The liquidator was directed to proceed with sale in favour of the applicants on the terms fixed by the order, and distribution of the proceeds was required to follow the statutory waterfall under Section 53 of the Code.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 11:12:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 87 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392943</link>
      <description>Where a liquidation sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern had not resulted in a concluded purchaser after the successful bidder withdrew, an enhanced offer could be accepted to maximise asset value and further the object of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The liquidator was directed to proceed with sale in favour of the applicants on the terms fixed by the order, and distribution of the proceeds was required to follow the statutory waterfall under Section 53 of the Code.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>