<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Legal Presumption Favors Cheque Holder u/s 139; Accused Must Rebut to Avoid Section 138 Charges.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52104</link>
    <description>Dishonor of Cheque - Corroborative piece of evidence is not a rule of law, but it is a rule of prudence and presumption under Section 139 of the Act, 1881 is rule of law and presumption has to be drawn by the court as per Section 139 of the Act, 1881. When presumption is not rebutted, charge under Section 138 of the Act, 1881 is established. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 10:38:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 10:38:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Presumption Favors Cheque Holder u/s 139; Accused Must Rebut to Avoid Section 138 Charges.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52104</link>
      <description>Dishonor of Cheque - Corroborative piece of evidence is not a rule of law, but it is a rule of prudence and presumption under Section 139 of the Act, 1881 is rule of law and presumption has to be drawn by the court as per Section 139 of the Act, 1881. When presumption is not rebutted, charge under Section 138 of the Act, 1881 is established. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 10:38:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>