<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2095 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286537</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding the disallowance of depreciation under Section 32 and the addition under Section 41(1) for the cessation of liability. The judgment emphasized the importance of business continuity and proper accounting treatment in determining tax liabilities under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 10:22:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2095 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286537</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding the disallowance of depreciation under Section 32 and the addition under Section 41(1) for the cessation of liability. The judgment emphasized the importance of business continuity and proper accounting treatment in determining tax liabilities under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>