<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 14 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21564</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue for questions 1 to 3 related to section 80J deductions, aligning with the decision in Lohia Machines Ltd. v. Union of India. However, for question 4 concerning expenses eligible for development allowance under section 35B, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing weighted deductions on certain expenses directly related to exports. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:28:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 14 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21564</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue for questions 1 to 3 related to section 80J deductions, aligning with the decision in Lohia Machines Ltd. v. Union of India. However, for question 4 concerning expenses eligible for development allowance under section 35B, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing weighted deductions on certain expenses directly related to exports. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>