<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 64 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392920</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a GST show-cause notice and proposed action was treated as premature because the statutory GST framework provides a complete mechanism for dealing with alleged tax evasion. Since a reply had already been filed and no final order had yet been passed by the competent authority, judicial interference at that stage was considered unwarranted, and no interference was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 64 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392920</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a GST show-cause notice and proposed action was treated as premature because the statutory GST framework provides a complete mechanism for dealing with alleged tax evasion. Since a reply had already been filed and no final order had yet been passed by the competent authority, judicial interference at that stage was considered unwarranted, and no interference was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>