<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 44 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392900</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the matter back to the AO for fresh adjudication on the eligibility of the deduction under section 80P(2)(d), while also addressing the broader issue of whether souharda sahakaris can be considered co-operative societies for the purposes of section 80P(2)(d). The Tribunal emphasized the need for the AO to examine other conditions for allowing the deduction, in line with previous Tribunal decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 44 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392900</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the matter back to the AO for fresh adjudication on the eligibility of the deduction under section 80P(2)(d), while also addressing the broader issue of whether souharda sahakaris can be considered co-operative societies for the purposes of section 80P(2)(d). The Tribunal emphasized the need for the AO to examine other conditions for allowing the deduction, in line with previous Tribunal decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>