https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392897 Regular bail was refused where the accused's role was found to be distinct and more serious than that of the co-accused. The court held that parity could not be claimed because the allegations showed direct involvement in creating fear of official action, introducing the complainant to the co-accused, and actively participating in the demand and receipt of tainted money. Recovery of bribe money from the accused further distinguished his position from the co-accused, who had been granted bail on a different footing. The bail application was dismissed. en-us Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Mar 2020 12:15:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392897 Regular bail was refused where the accused's role was found to be distinct and more serious than that of the co-accused. The court held that parity could not be claimed because the allegations showed direct involvement in creating fear of official action, introducing the complainant to the co-accused, and actively participating in the demand and receipt of tainted money. Recovery of bribe money from the accused further distinguished his position from the co-accused, who had been granted bail on a different footing. The bail application was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392897