https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392891 Under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013, only persons whose legal interests are directly affected by striking off or restoration of a company's name can be treated as "persons aggrieved" or "persons concerned." A debtor whose liability is unaffected by restoration has no enforceable legal prejudice and therefore lacks locus standi to intervene in the restoration proceedings. For the same reason, such a debtor cannot maintain an appeal against the restoration order after rejection of intervention. The restoration challenge was rejected, and the company's name remained restored with costs. en-us Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Mar 2020 12:04:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392891 Under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013, only persons whose legal interests are directly affected by striking off or restoration of a company's name can be treated as "persons aggrieved" or "persons concerned." A debtor whose liability is unaffected by restoration has no enforceable legal prejudice and therefore lacks locus standi to intervene in the restoration proceedings. For the same reason, such a debtor cannot maintain an appeal against the restoration order after rejection of intervention. The restoration challenge was rejected, and the company's name remained restored with costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392891