<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 27 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392883</link>
    <description>The court admitted the Company Petition under section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the private company. The default by the Corporate Debtor was established, leading to the admission of the petition. A moratorium was declared under section 14 of the IBC, and operational procedures for the CIRP period were outlined, including the appointment of an Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) and compliance reporting. The decision was based on the evidence provided by the Operational Creditor and the lack of representation from the Corporate Debtor, ensuring adherence to IBC regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:46:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 27 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392883</link>
      <description>The court admitted the Company Petition under section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the private company. The default by the Corporate Debtor was established, leading to the admission of the petition. A moratorium was declared under section 14 of the IBC, and operational procedures for the CIRP period were outlined, including the appointment of an Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) and compliance reporting. The decision was based on the evidence provided by the Operational Creditor and the lack of representation from the Corporate Debtor, ensuring adherence to IBC regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>