<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 14 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392870</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant, confirming the eligibility of cenvat credit on railway construction materials and wagons used for transportation within the factory premises. The decision emphasized the integral role of railway tracks in the manufacturing process, following the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling that highlighted the significance of their use in actual production activities. The appellant&#039;s detailed explanation of how the materials were utilized within the plant for transporting raw materials and hot metal was accepted, overturning the Commissioner&#039;s denial of relief based on their incidental use for other purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 10:59:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 14 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392870</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant, confirming the eligibility of cenvat credit on railway construction materials and wagons used for transportation within the factory premises. The decision emphasized the integral role of railway tracks in the manufacturing process, following the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling that highlighted the significance of their use in actual production activities. The appellant&#039;s detailed explanation of how the materials were utilized within the plant for transporting raw materials and hot metal was accepted, overturning the Commissioner&#039;s denial of relief based on their incidental use for other purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>