https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392859 The court dismissed the suit for partition of immovable properties and dissolution of partnership firms, emphasizing that seeking partition again after an alleged partition under the Agreement/Family Settlement is impermissible. The court highlighted the distinction between seeking partition and recovery of possession, stressing the need for plaintiffs to clarify their stance on the partition affected by the Agreement/Family Settlement. Recognizing jointness in coparcenary and partnership, the court required a comprehensive overhaul of the plaint instead of a mere amendment, with liberty granted to sue for enforcement of obligations under the Agreement/Family Settlement. en-us Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Mar 2020 10:23:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392859 The court dismissed the suit for partition of immovable properties and dissolution of partnership firms, emphasizing that seeking partition again after an alleged partition under the Agreement/Family Settlement is impermissible. The court highlighted the distinction between seeking partition and recovery of possession, stressing the need for plaintiffs to clarify their stance on the partition affected by the Agreement/Family Settlement. Recognizing jointness in coparcenary and partnership, the court required a comprehensive overhaul of the plaint instead of a mere amendment, with liberty granted to sue for enforcement of obligations under the Agreement/Family Settlement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392859