<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1730 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286505</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The judgment emphasized the importance of the proper application of mind by the Assessing Officer and upheld the sustainability of the view taken in the original assessment proceedings regarding the computation of long term capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 08:50:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1730 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286505</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The judgment emphasized the importance of the proper application of mind by the Assessing Officer and upheld the sustainability of the view taken in the original assessment proceedings regarding the computation of long term capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>