<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 36 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21553</link>
    <description>The court held that the penalty under section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act is penal in nature and not compensatory. Consequently, it cannot be deducted under section 37 of the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that penalties for statutory violations are not deductible as business expenses. The decision favored the Revenue, ruling against allowing the penalty as a deduction in computing total income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:48:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 36 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21553</link>
      <description>The court held that the penalty under section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act is penal in nature and not compensatory. Consequently, it cannot be deducted under section 37 of the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that penalties for statutory violations are not deductible as business expenses. The decision favored the Revenue, ruling against allowing the penalty as a deduction in computing total income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>