<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1300 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392856</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a detention order and subsequent tax and penalty determination due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to comply and file a reply. The Court held that discretionary jurisdiction could not be exercised under Article 226 of the Constitution, leading to the dismissal of the petition. However, the judgment clarified that the petitioner still had the right to pursue a statutory appeal as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 13:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1300 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392856</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a detention order and subsequent tax and penalty determination due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to comply and file a reply. The Court held that discretionary jurisdiction could not be exercised under Article 226 of the Constitution, leading to the dismissal of the petition. However, the judgment clarified that the petitioner still had the right to pursue a statutory appeal as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>