https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392854 The court held that the confiscation of goods and conveyance under Section 130 of the GST Act was impermissible due to the absence of discrepancies. The petitioner was directed to cooperate with authorities, leading to the release of the conveyance. Interim relief was granted for the release of goods pending final disposal. Emphasis was placed on compliance with the confiscation order, with the petitioner fulfilling payment obligations. The court directed the petitioner to appeal the final order in Form GST-MOV-11 under Section 107 of the Act, ensuring legal recourse. Overall, the judgment addressed the issues comprehensively, providing clarity and directives for compliance and appeal. en-us Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Mar 2025 14:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392854 The court held that the confiscation of goods and conveyance under Section 130 of the GST Act was impermissible due to the absence of discrepancies. The petitioner was directed to cooperate with authorities, leading to the release of the conveyance. Interim relief was granted for the release of goods pending final disposal. Emphasis was placed on compliance with the confiscation order, with the petitioner fulfilling payment obligations. The court directed the petitioner to appeal the final order in Form GST-MOV-11 under Section 107 of the Act, ensuring legal recourse. Overall, the judgment addressed the issues comprehensively, providing clarity and directives for compliance and appeal. Case-Laws GST Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392854