<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1294 - PATIALA HOUSE COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392850</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was refused in a CGST investigation alleging issuance of fake GST invoices and evasion of tax. The court treated the applicant&#039;s statement under investigation, the accountant&#039;s statement, and seized account books and registers as material showing a systematic scheme to issue fake invoices and defraud the exchequer. The plea that the statement was obtained under coercion was not accepted at that stage, as the applicant had been given time to join investigation and had court protection. On the available material, the court held that discretionary pre-arrest relief was not justified and dismissed the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1294 - PATIALA HOUSE COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392850</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was refused in a CGST investigation alleging issuance of fake GST invoices and evasion of tax. The court treated the applicant&#039;s statement under investigation, the accountant&#039;s statement, and seized account books and registers as material showing a systematic scheme to issue fake invoices and defraud the exchequer. The plea that the statement was obtained under coercion was not accepted at that stage, as the applicant had been given time to join investigation and had court protection. On the available material, the court held that discretionary pre-arrest relief was not justified and dismissed the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>