https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392846 The court deferred the execution of the notice issued by the Income Tax Officer demanding payment of income tax dues pending appeal. It directed the ITO to consider the petitioner's application for a stay within six weeks and instructed not to enforce compliance with the notice until the application is resolved. The petitioner was authorized to inform the bank not to act on the notice. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness and the need for the ITO to consider the petitioner's request for stay before enforcing payment, promoting a balanced approach in tax recovery proceedings. en-us Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:01:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392846 The court deferred the execution of the notice issued by the Income Tax Officer demanding payment of income tax dues pending appeal. It directed the ITO to consider the petitioner's application for a stay within six weeks and instructed not to enforce compliance with the notice until the application is resolved. The petitioner was authorized to inform the bank not to act on the notice. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness and the need for the ITO to consider the petitioner's request for stay before enforcing payment, promoting a balanced approach in tax recovery proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392846