<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (4) TMI 36 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21550</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the sum claimed as entertainment expenditure for providing tea and cold drinks to customers should be disallowed under section 37(2A) of the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized the retrospective effect of Explanation 2, clarifying that hospitality expenses fall under entertainment expenditure, leading to the decision against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:40:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (4) TMI 36 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21550</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the sum claimed as entertainment expenditure for providing tea and cold drinks to customers should be disallowed under section 37(2A) of the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized the retrospective effect of Explanation 2, clarifying that hospitality expenses fall under entertainment expenditure, leading to the decision against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>