<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1281 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392837</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that no addition was justified under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act. The decision overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the addition. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence and rejected the notion of making additions based on conjectures. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the grounds raised were accepted, highlighting the significance of concrete evidence in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:49:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1281 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392837</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that no addition was justified under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act. The decision overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the addition. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence and rejected the notion of making additions based on conjectures. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the grounds raised were accepted, highlighting the significance of concrete evidence in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>