<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1266 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392822</link>
    <description>The court quashed the order rejecting the request to amend the shipping bill due to an inadvertent omission in claiming benefit under the MEIS scheme. A mandamus was issued to the second respondent to make the necessary amendments as advised by the petitioner, emphasizing that such errors should not impede entitlement consideration under the MEIS scheme. The writ petition was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1266 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392822</link>
      <description>The court quashed the order rejecting the request to amend the shipping bill due to an inadvertent omission in claiming benefit under the MEIS scheme. A mandamus was issued to the second respondent to make the necessary amendments as advised by the petitioner, emphasizing that such errors should not impede entitlement consideration under the MEIS scheme. The writ petition was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>