<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 24 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21546</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, disallowing the deduction claim for the provision made for future interest by the exporter of tea. The court held that the provision did not accrue as a liability by the specified date and was deemed a contingent liability. The issue regarding whether 10% of the export price constituted income for the assessment year was not addressed by the court as it was not part of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:32:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 24 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21546</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, disallowing the deduction claim for the provision made for future interest by the exporter of tea. The court held that the provision did not accrue as a liability by the specified date and was deemed a contingent liability. The issue regarding whether 10% of the export price constituted income for the assessment year was not addressed by the court as it was not part of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>