<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1258 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392814</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutionality of Section 8(4) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and the Prevention of Money Laundering (Taking Possession of Attached or Frozen Properties Confirmed by Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2013. It found the provisions necessary to prevent money laundering and confiscate proceeds of crime, dismissing the writ petition. The court determined that the challenged provisions were not arbitrary and did not violate Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 10:28:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1258 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392814</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutionality of Section 8(4) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and the Prevention of Money Laundering (Taking Possession of Attached or Frozen Properties Confirmed by Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2013. It found the provisions necessary to prevent money laundering and confiscate proceeds of crime, dismissing the writ petition. The court determined that the challenged provisions were not arbitrary and did not violate Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>