<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1257 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392813</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in a PMLA prosecution was confirmed where the accused had cooperated with investigation for a substantial period, had not been arrested during inquiry, and the agency did not show that custodial interrogation was immediately necessary. The court treated the interim protection as having operated satisfactorily, noted that statements had been recorded and properties provisionally attached, and accepted the petitioners&#039; readiness to join investigation whenever required. On that basis, the interim orders were made absolute and the petitioners continued on anticipatory bail in the complaint proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1257 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392813</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in a PMLA prosecution was confirmed where the accused had cooperated with investigation for a substantial period, had not been arrested during inquiry, and the agency did not show that custodial interrogation was immediately necessary. The court treated the interim protection as having operated satisfactorily, noted that statements had been recorded and properties provisionally attached, and accepted the petitioners&#039; readiness to join investigation whenever required. On that basis, the interim orders were made absolute and the petitioners continued on anticipatory bail in the complaint proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>