<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 50 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21544</link>
    <description>Section 35B(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not properly applied by the Income-tax Officer, resulting in excessive relief to the assessee. The Commissioner therefore set aside the assessment and required the claim to be reexamined. The Tribunal directed the officer to apply the principles laid down in J. Hemchand and Co., and the Gujarat High Court upheld that approach, leaving the decision in the assessee&#039;s favour.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:26:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 50 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21544</link>
      <description>Section 35B(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not properly applied by the Income-tax Officer, resulting in excessive relief to the assessee. The Commissioner therefore set aside the assessment and required the claim to be reexamined. The Tribunal directed the officer to apply the principles laid down in J. Hemchand and Co., and the Gujarat High Court upheld that approach, leaving the decision in the assessee&#039;s favour.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>