<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 898 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286480</link>
    <description>A transferee pendente lite who bought the suit property with notice of a prior agreement to sell and in breach of a restraint order could be impleaded in the specific performance suit. The transfer did not extinguish the transferor&#039;s title, but it remained subject to the pending proceedings and any eventual decree. A purchaser for value without notice may resist specific performance, yet that protection was unavailable here because the transferee was not bona fide. The transferee&#039;s presence was treated as necessary or proper to ensure effective adjudication, bind the parties to the decree, and avoid prejudice and multiplicity of proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2023 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 898 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286480</link>
      <description>A transferee pendente lite who bought the suit property with notice of a prior agreement to sell and in breach of a restraint order could be impleaded in the specific performance suit. The transfer did not extinguish the transferor&#039;s title, but it remained subject to the pending proceedings and any eventual decree. A purchaser for value without notice may resist specific performance, yet that protection was unavailable here because the transferee was not bona fide. The transferee&#039;s presence was treated as necessary or proper to ensure effective adjudication, bind the parties to the decree, and avoid prejudice and multiplicity of proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>