<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1235 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392791</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the CIT (A) and the Tribunal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The additions under Section 35D of the Income Tax Act and for rent, rates, and taxes were deleted, emphasizing the revenue nature of the expenses. The Court did not address the deduction for the principal part of rent received as it did not arise from the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1235 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392791</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the CIT (A) and the Tribunal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The additions under Section 35D of the Income Tax Act and for rent, rates, and taxes were deleted, emphasizing the revenue nature of the expenses. The Court did not address the deduction for the principal part of rent received as it did not arise from the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>