<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1233 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392789</link>
    <description>The Revenue appealed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act against the ITAT&#039;s order for the assessment year 2014-2015. The case involved questions of law concerning the dismissal of the Miscellaneous application by the ITAT without addressing the merits. Key issues included the interpretation of CBDT Circular No. 5/2014, application of Section 14A and Rule 8D on expenses related to earning exempt income, disallowance of interest, apportionment of expenses, and the legality of the circular in line with legislative intent. The appeal focused on the ITAT&#039;s failure to consider these legal aspects, raising doubts on the application and interpretation of relevant provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1233 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392789</link>
      <description>The Revenue appealed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act against the ITAT&#039;s order for the assessment year 2014-2015. The case involved questions of law concerning the dismissal of the Miscellaneous application by the ITAT without addressing the merits. Key issues included the interpretation of CBDT Circular No. 5/2014, application of Section 14A and Rule 8D on expenses related to earning exempt income, disallowance of interest, apportionment of expenses, and the legality of the circular in line with legislative intent. The appeal focused on the ITAT&#039;s failure to consider these legal aspects, raising doubts on the application and interpretation of relevant provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>