<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1219 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392775</link>
    <description>The royalty payment issue was not finally decided on the merits, as the High Court had relied on an earlier precedent adverse to the assessee. The Supreme Court set aside the impugned judgment and restored the appeal to the High Court for fresh consideration on its own merits and in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 11:43:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1219 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392775</link>
      <description>The royalty payment issue was not finally decided on the merits, as the High Court had relied on an earlier precedent adverse to the assessee. The Supreme Court set aside the impugned judgment and restored the appeal to the High Court for fresh consideration on its own merits and in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>