https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392769 The High Court held that the initiation notification did not immediately prejudice the petitioners, dismissing their challenge. The court emphasized that the Designated Authority had considered relevant facts before issuing the notification, and withdrawal of support by certain producers did not invalidate the process. It was noted that determining respondent no.3's eligibility as a domestic industry is part of the ongoing investigation and should be decided by the Designated Authority. The court found no violation of natural justice principles at the initiation stage and highlighted the availability of alternative remedies, ultimately allowing the investigation to proceed. en-us Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392769 The High Court held that the initiation notification did not immediately prejudice the petitioners, dismissing their challenge. The court emphasized that the Designated Authority had considered relevant facts before issuing the notification, and withdrawal of support by certain producers did not invalidate the process. It was noted that determining respondent no.3's eligibility as a domestic industry is part of the ongoing investigation and should be decided by the Designated Authority. The court found no violation of natural justice principles at the initiation stage and highlighted the availability of alternative remedies, ultimately allowing the investigation to proceed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392769