https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392764 The court disposed of the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 filed by the Revenue against a final order by CESTAT due to the monetary limit set by the Ministry of Finance. However, the court kept open the substantial question of law for future consideration, emphasizing that challenges to constitutional validity or legality beyond monetary limits would require contestation. The appeal was disposed of based on the monetary limit but left the substantial question of law open for adjudication in a suitable appeal. en-us Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:30:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392764 The court disposed of the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 filed by the Revenue against a final order by CESTAT due to the monetary limit set by the Ministry of Finance. However, the court kept open the substantial question of law for future consideration, emphasizing that challenges to constitutional validity or legality beyond monetary limits would require contestation. The appeal was disposed of based on the monetary limit but left the substantial question of law open for adjudication in a suitable appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392764