https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392754 The Tribunal allowed the appeals of M/s. Vivilon Textiles, Confidence Exports, and Shri Harish Bulchandani, dismissing the appeal of Suhel Roadlines. Penalties under Rule 26 were deemed unsustainable due to lack of cross-examination and inapplicability to corporate entities. Adjudicating Authority's failure to comply with cross-examination requirements was criticized, emphasizing the importance of judicial discipline and natural justice. en-us Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392754 The Tribunal allowed the appeals of M/s. Vivilon Textiles, Confidence Exports, and Shri Harish Bulchandani, dismissing the appeal of Suhel Roadlines. Penalties under Rule 26 were deemed unsustainable due to lack of cross-examination and inapplicability to corporate entities. Adjudicating Authority's failure to comply with cross-examination requirements was criticized, emphasizing the importance of judicial discipline and natural justice. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392754