https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392752 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the interpretation of Notification No. 2/2006-CE(NT) and 11/2006-CE(NT) and the applicability of Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It held that the appellant's manufactured goods, not exclusively for automobiles but usable by various manufacturers, did not fall under the purview of Section 4A. Consequently, the differential central excise duty liability and penalty imposed under Rule 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 were set aside, relieving the appellant of the duty liability. en-us Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392752 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the interpretation of Notification No. 2/2006-CE(NT) and 11/2006-CE(NT) and the applicability of Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It held that the appellant's manufactured goods, not exclusively for automobiles but usable by various manufacturers, did not fall under the purview of Section 4A. Consequently, the differential central excise duty liability and penalty imposed under Rule 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 were set aside, relieving the appellant of the duty liability. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392752