https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286469 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's Miscellaneous Application seeking the recalling of the order passed due to low tax effect, citing that challenging ITAT orders should be done through legal recourse, not a Miscellaneous Application under section 254(2) of the Act. The Tribunal found no apparent mistake in the original order related to the disallowance of expenses under section 14A of the Act, even without earning exempt income, and upheld the dismissal, emphasizing the need for proper legal channels in challenging orders. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:29:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286469 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's Miscellaneous Application seeking the recalling of the order passed due to low tax effect, citing that challenging ITAT orders should be done through legal recourse, not a Miscellaneous Application under section 254(2) of the Act. The Tribunal found no apparent mistake in the original order related to the disallowance of expenses under section 14A of the Act, even without earning exempt income, and upheld the dismissal, emphasizing the need for proper legal channels in challenging orders. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286469