https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286472 Employees' monetary and service claims depending on disputed facts, including whether they worked beyond 58 years and were entitled to salary and benefits, were held unsuitable for writ adjudication because the proper statutory mechanism for computation and recovery was Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The availability of an alternative remedy was not an absolute bar, but the writ forum was not the appropriate venue for resolving factual disputes. The Union of India was also found not legally liable to fund the wage dues of a government company, since such a company remains a separate legal entity and its liabilities do not automatically become those of the Union. en-us Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:29:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286472 Employees' monetary and service claims depending on disputed facts, including whether they worked beyond 58 years and were entitled to salary and benefits, were held unsuitable for writ adjudication because the proper statutory mechanism for computation and recovery was Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The availability of an alternative remedy was not an absolute bar, but the writ forum was not the appropriate venue for resolving factual disputes. The Union of India was also found not legally liable to fund the wage dues of a government company, since such a company remains a separate legal entity and its liabilities do not automatically become those of the Union. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286472