<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1972 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286460</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing for intra-group services depends on whether services were actually received, what commercial benefit accrued, and whether cost allocation and comparability are supported by reliable evidence. Detailed allocation sheets, email support, service descriptions, and time-spent records were accepted as showing genuine management support services, so the adjustment on management support fees was deleted. For interest received from an associated enterprise, internal CUP and the assessee&#039;s fixed deposit rate supported arm&#039;s length treatment, and use of the RBI prime lending rate was found inappropriate. No adjustment was warranted on the interest receipt, and the disputed transfer pricing additions were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:29:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1972 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286460</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing for intra-group services depends on whether services were actually received, what commercial benefit accrued, and whether cost allocation and comparability are supported by reliable evidence. Detailed allocation sheets, email support, service descriptions, and time-spent records were accepted as showing genuine management support services, so the adjustment on management support fees was deleted. For interest received from an associated enterprise, internal CUP and the assessee&#039;s fixed deposit rate supported arm&#039;s length treatment, and use of the RBI prime lending rate was found inappropriate. No adjustment was warranted on the interest receipt, and the disputed transfer pricing additions were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>